UserVoice Alternatives for Enterprise and App Teams
UserVoice calls itself an enterprise customer intelligence platform. It collects feedback through branded portals, in-app feedback, a Chrome extension, Slack and sources such as Zendesk, uses AI to find themes, and connects to Salesforce, Jira and Azure DevOps. Teams compare it with other tools because they want to see a price before a sales call, want to start smaller, or need feedback inside a mobile app. This post covers those reasons, what an enterprise buyer should check, and seven alternatives.
We make FeedbackKit, so read this with that in mind. Every fact about UserVoice and the other tools below comes from each provider's own pages, checked on 17 October 2026 and linked where it is used. We did not use review sites or third-party price estimates.
The short version
- UserVoice publishes no prices. Its pricing page says plans are based on feedback volume, tools and integrations, never by seat, and the route in is a demo.
- Productboard and Aha! Ideas are the closest like-for-like options for product organisations: portals, voting, Salesforce and Jira.
- Canny, Featurebase, Sleekplan and Nolt offer enterprise tiers with SSO, and publish their entry prices.
- FeedbackKit is not an enterprise feedback platform. It fits the mobile team inside a larger company that wants voting in a native app.
Why teams look for a UserVoice alternative
These come from UserVoice's own home page and pricing page, and its archived SDK repositories on GitHub.
- No public price. The pricing page says plans are "based on feedback volume, tools leveraged and the integrations you connect, never by seat". The call to action is "Talk to an Expert", which leads to a demo.
- No free plan, and the trial follows a demo. There is a 30-day free trial, which the UserVoice team sets up after the demo.
- It is built for large organisations. The home page speaks to CROs, CPOs and product operations teams. A small product team may buy more than it uses.
- No current mobile SDK. The home page does not mention mobile SDKs, and UserVoice's iOS SDK and Android SDK repositories on GitHub are archived, with the last push in July 2019.
For many enterprises none of this is a problem, and pricing that ignores seats can be good value when hundreds of people log feedback.
What an enterprise buyer should check
- Identity: SAML SSO, SCIM and custom roles, and the plan they need.
- Revenue: account revenue from Salesforce or HubSpot.
- Engineering: Jira, Azure DevOps, and whether statuses flow back.
- The pricing unit: seats, makers, tracked users or volume.
- Procurement: invoicing, custom terms, security reviews and SOC 2.
- Where customers give feedback: a web portal, a web widget, or a mobile app.
Seven UserVoice alternatives
The list is in no order of merit.
Productboard
Productboard is a product management platform with an AI agent called Spark, an insights repository, roadmaps and customer-facing product portals with custom voting questions. It suits product organisations that want feedback, prioritisation and roadmaps in one system. Its pricing page publishes no prices: Business is "Request demo" and Enterprise is "Contact sales". Pricing is per maker (the product managers who own strategy), with a minimum of 5 makers. Business includes 25 contributors, 2 product portals, Jira, Azure DevOps and Zendesk. Enterprise adds SAML SSO, SCIM, custom roles and Salesforce.
Aha! Ideas
Aha! Ideas is an idea management product: ideas portals where customers share feedback and vote, an idea review workflow, scoring and prioritisation by potential revenue. It suits teams already using, or considering, Aha! Roadmaps. Its pricing page lists Essentials from $39 per user a month billed annually, or $49 monthly, with a minimum of 3 paid users and unlimited portals and portal users. Advanced, from $59 annually or $74 monthly, adds Salesforce, HubSpot, Zendesk and Jira integrations, proxy voting, in-app widgets, customer segments and branded portal domains. There is a 30-day free trial.
Canny
Canny is a feedback portal with a roadmap, a changelog and Autopilot, which captures feedback from support and sales tools such as Intercom, Zendesk, Gong and Zoom. It suits B2B SaaS companies that want a published entry price and room to grow into an enterprise contract. On its pricing page, Free covers 25 tracked users and Pro starts at $79 a month billed yearly, or $99 monthly, for 100 tracked users, with Jira, Linear, GitHub, Asana, ClickUp and Azure DevOps. Business is priced on request and includes SSO (Okta, OIDC, Entra ID, OneLogin); HubSpot and Salesforce (CRM) are a paid add-on on Business. Our Canny vs UserVoice comparison goes deeper.
Featurebase
Featurebase sells a helpdesk and feedback suite in one subscription. It suits companies replacing a support tool and a feedback tool together. Its pricing page lists Growth at $29 per seat a month billed yearly ($37 billed monthly), Professional at $59 ($75) with SSO, Salesforce and HubSpot and 20 free Lite seats, and Enterprise at $99 ($129) per seat a month with a multi-brand workspace, SSO and identity management, custom admin roles and Azure DevOps. AI resolutions cost $0.49 each. See FeedbackKit vs Featurebase.
FeedbackKit
FeedbackKit is in-app feedback and feature voting for app teams, and it is a different shape from UserVoice. It has native SDKs for Swift and SwiftUI (iOS 26, macOS 26 and visionOS 26 or later), Kotlin with Jetpack Compose, Flutter and React Native, so customers vote and comment in your app's own screens. Your app can pass each user's MRR through the SDK, and requests can be sorted by the total MRR of the users behind them, on every plan. On Pro and up, it creates and syncs tickets in GitHub, Linear, Notion, ClickUp, Monday.com, Trello, Airtable, Asana and Basecamp, and connects to HubSpot and Salesforce. It suits a mobile team inside a larger company. Our post on enterprise feedback suites and app teams covers that split.
Prices are public on our pricing page: Free at $0 for 1 project and 10 visible feedback items per project, Pro at $15 a month or $150 a year, and Team at $39 a month or $390 a year with unlimited projects and team members. See FeedbackKit vs UserVoice for the full table.
Here is how that looks in FeedbackKit, with sample data from a fictional hiking app:
Votes inside the app
Sleekplan
Sleekplan is a web feedback suite with a board, a changelog, a roadmap, CSAT, NPS and surveys. It suits mid-sized SaaS teams. Its pricing page lists a free Indie plan, Starter at 15 a month or 13 billed yearly (the currency follows your location), and a custom Enterprise plan with SAML SSO (Okta, Azure AD, Auth0), custom contracts and invoicing, and multi-workspace organisations. Its integrations page lists Jira Cloud, Jira Data Center and Azure DevOps. See FeedbackKit vs Sleekplan.
Nolt
Nolt is a hosted feedback board with a roadmap and a changelog, and flat-rate plans with unlimited users. It suits teams that want a focused board with enterprise identity controls. Its pricing page shows Essential at $39 a month, or $348 billed annually, and Pro at $89 a month with Jira, Linear and Microsoft Teams. Enterprise is custom and lists SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect, Okta, OneLogin, Entra ID and SCIM, payment by invoice, a security review and a 99.9% uptime SLA. See FeedbackKit vs Nolt.
Prices side by side
As shown on each pricing page on 17 October 2026. "On request" means the page gives no figure.
| Tool | Entry price | Higher tier | Price scales with |
|---|---|---|---|
| UserVoice | On request, after a demo | On request | Feedback volume, tools and integrations |
| Productboard | On request (Business) | On request | Makers, minimum 5 |
| Aha! Ideas | Essentials: $39 per user a month billed annually, $49 monthly | Advanced: $59 annually, $74 monthly | Users, minimum 3 |
| Canny | Free; Pro from $79 a month billed yearly, $99 monthly | Business: on request | Tracked users |
| Featurebase | Free; Growth $29 per seat a month billed yearly, $37 monthly | Enterprise: $99 per seat a month billed yearly | Seats, plus AI resolutions |
| FeedbackKit | Free; Pro $15 a month or $150 a year | Team: $39 a month or $390 a year | Plan tier |
| Sleekplan | Free; Starter 15 a month, 13 billed yearly (currency follows your location) | Enterprise: on request | Plan tier and add-ons |
| Nolt | Essential: $39 a month, or $348 billed annually | Enterprise: on request | Boards per plan |
Our UserVoice pricing explainer covers what UserVoice does say about how it prices.
When to stay with UserVoice
- You sell to large B2B accounts and want feedback tied to Salesforce account revenue, with Gainsight or Zendesk feeding in alongside.
- Your engineers work in Jira or Azure DevOps and your company runs on Microsoft Teams.
- Many people across sales and success log feedback, so pricing that is never by seat works in your favour.
- Security reviews are done. UserVoice states SOC 2 Type II and GDPR on its home page, and re-running procurement has a real cost.
When FeedbackKit is not the right fit
For most enterprise feedback programmes, FeedbackKit is not a replacement for UserVoice. It has no hosted public roadmap and no changelog for your users, no Jira or Azure DevOps integration, no Zapier or Make, and no Microsoft Teams notifications. There are six built-in statuses and no custom ones. The Swift SDK needs iOS 26, macOS 26 or visionOS 26. If your product lives in a browser, the JavaScript SDK is headless and has no screens. There is no in-app chat and there are no surveys. Where FeedbackKit can help is narrower: the app team that wants customers voting inside a native app, with requests ranked by revenue and pushed to the tracker that team uses.
If that is your team, see the Swift and Kotlin docs, or the REST API reference. You can start free with one project and no sales call.